Endosulfan banned conditionally ??????

Dear All

Happy to note that our leaders have accepted ill effects of endosulfan with a condition of buying 5 years time. In this connection, some of the key issues on which we all need to concentrate are:

@ what is the need to buy the time with a condition?
@ who is interested to continue the damage caused already to the people and
environment?
@ who are going to be the victims or looser?
@ what will happen to the people who got affected?
@ who is going to take the responsibility of their
rehabilitation with support systems including livelihood?
@ who is going to get the benefit or cream?
@ what is the reason to allow the victim or
looser to get further sufferers?
@ what is the reason to allow the gainer to get more benefit?
@ is it the fact there that is no alternative for
this killer endosulfan?
@ is it the fact that our research wing is not having any need based future plans?
@ whom to blame for this critical situation i.e., the user or producer or seller or
policy makers?
@ certainly it is the group consisting of producer,seller and policy makers.
@ who believes this?
@ why this group should realize?
@ this group is not burning their fingers?
@ this group enjoy the taste of cream?

................ the list will continues as the problem is expected to continue though the solution is at some distance. It is like hide and seek game.

Based on the well known version that, polluters should pay the penalty for the damage cause for the people and environment, now the manufacturers should pay for the rehabilitation of the affected people and environment.

Hope, people will raise to the occasion to get the support for the damage caused by the cream eater.

Looking forward for better and strong network for getting the right choice with need based strategies and interventions.