Dear All
India is trying its best to work for the food security for its people. In spite of odd situation and other vulnerable challenges like:drought, floods,poverty,population,land for other non agricultural activities, transformation of greenery to concrete jungles, disability, health hazards, hiv/aids,pollution and other forms of disasters both man made and natural, people of our nation are struggling for the basic needs like: roti, kapada and makhan. Though we consider / think that FARMER is the KING (Raite Raju), the reality at the grass root level is quite opposite. They struggle for: water, current, seed, fertilizers, technology, harvesting, storing, marketing and all these results for their depression, loans, poverty, malnutrition, suicide and finally low priority. Under these challenges, still our farmers are doing excellent work and producing the food for all of us. Then what is happening? This was purchased and stored by the concerned departments and could not be distributed to the needy. This has resulted for the rottenning of the rice and other food items which otherwise should have been distributed to us. In spite of the direction for the Court, the things were not distributed to the needy and instead stating that it can not be distributed with out mentioning the actual barriers if any. This process cannot be digested by any common man as food is produced to eat in the right way with out wasting or leaving unused with out proper storage. By all angles, this process is not justifiable and needs immediate action to the justice by distributing the products to the needy in the best possible way before it is totally spoiled and which may become the cause for pollution in terms health and water.
Hope that concerned authorities may consider this issue on the humanity basis and to do the justice for the work done by our farmer friends who produce food for all us.
Looking forward for better solutions...
Looking forward
Tuesday, October 26, 2010
Addition on CSR
Dear ALL
As long as:
......people are struggling for basic...
...... equality among the people is not achieved....
...... people are facing challenges, vulnerable circumstances....
....... access with connectivity is not established for ALL.....
...as long as concept, ethics, systems were followed on need based strategies.
CSR works for the empowerment of the people to lead better living with sustainability and quality of life...
posted as a comment at: www.socialedge.org
As long as:
......people are struggling for basic...
...... equality among the people is not achieved....
...... people are facing challenges, vulnerable circumstances....
....... access with connectivity is not established for ALL.....
...as long as concept, ethics, systems were followed on need based strategies.
CSR works for the empowerment of the people to lead better living with sustainability and quality of life...
posted as a comment at: www.socialedge.org
Benefits and need of Corporate Social Responsibility
CSR is the process linking the people and the business. Business is for the people by the people. As business can't be done without people, CSR is necessary and provides benefits to all the stakeholders.
Benefits to Industry:
@ Better awareness about the industry and the business
@ Acceptance
@ Better marketing and business
@ Better support from the Government and other stakeholders
@ Tax,subsidies and other benefits
@ Free advertisement
@ Better motivation of the employees and thus higher production with quality
@ Sustainability in the market and long term benefits
@ Be part of the social change or development
@ Awards and recognition.
In view of these benefits, industry or corporate or business sector should treat the CSR as the return to the community or people in view of its business and profits. This should work as a win - win strategy as the relationships alone works for better business and thus development of the people / community / nation.
I am associated with the CSR both at Research / HR Development and implementation at the grass root levels covering the rural villages of India. The strategy / policy of CSR got transformed from the support view to partnership on need based approaches.
As long as the concept, strategy and approaches of CSR are need based, i don't expect any disadvantages with it. In fact it plays significant role in filling the Resource GAP which exits between the GO - NGO - PEOPLE.
Looking forward for strengthening of need based CSR for the real development of the people/community/nation/world.
Benefits to Industry:
@ Better awareness about the industry and the business
@ Acceptance
@ Better marketing and business
@ Better support from the Government and other stakeholders
@ Tax,subsidies and other benefits
@ Free advertisement
@ Better motivation of the employees and thus higher production with quality
@ Sustainability in the market and long term benefits
@ Be part of the social change or development
@ Awards and recognition.
In view of these benefits, industry or corporate or business sector should treat the CSR as the return to the community or people in view of its business and profits. This should work as a win - win strategy as the relationships alone works for better business and thus development of the people / community / nation.
I am associated with the CSR both at Research / HR Development and implementation at the grass root levels covering the rural villages of India. The strategy / policy of CSR got transformed from the support view to partnership on need based approaches.
As long as the concept, strategy and approaches of CSR are need based, i don't expect any disadvantages with it. In fact it plays significant role in filling the Resource GAP which exits between the GO - NGO - PEOPLE.
Looking forward for strengthening of need based CSR for the real development of the people/community/nation/world.
Monday, October 25, 2010
Poverty Vs QOL or SOL
As per the existing laws,"EVERY ONE IS EQUAL BEFORE THE LAW". If so, why there should exist poverty? This supports us that, every one should have equal share in the development or in the existing resources. If this is implemented and monitored, there won't be any issues with poverty and we all can lead equal and better QOL or SOL with better access in an inclusive and barrier free environment. This is the need of the our to all including the persons with special needs.
Let us focus on the measures / strategies / approaches which can mitigate the poverty by enchaining the capacities of the needy people.
Looking forward ....
Note: Posted as a comment on "What's wrong with being poor?" at: www.socialedge.org
Let us focus on the measures / strategies / approaches which can mitigate the poverty by enchaining the capacities of the needy people.
Looking forward ....
Note: Posted as a comment on "What's wrong with being poor?" at: www.socialedge.org
What's wrong with being poor?
Poverty though it appears as the issue of the individuals or the family, in reality it is the issue of the society or the nation. In the developing or underdeveloped countries, majority of the people comes under the poverty and struggles for the basic needs. It is the fact that poverty and development are the cause and consequence of each other and results for poor quality of life with vulnerable circumstances which leads for disasters.
In the race of development with the technology, the resulted development is mostly confined to few hands or pockets and thus widens the GAP between the rich and poor. This type of development results for more disadvantages rather than isolated brightening spots.
Knowing the situation, we all need to look for the positive aspect of the development. This is possible when the development is planned with optimization of local resources with the participation of the stakeholders on need based approaches. It is possible and everyone should work for the development of all with barrier free environment as poverty acts as a barrier for the development.
I am working with the rural poor with the need based empowering strategies.
Looking forward for better networking...
with thanks
Note: This is the comments posted on the above subject at:www.socialedge.org
In the race of development with the technology, the resulted development is mostly confined to few hands or pockets and thus widens the GAP between the rich and poor. This type of development results for more disadvantages rather than isolated brightening spots.
Knowing the situation, we all need to look for the positive aspect of the development. This is possible when the development is planned with optimization of local resources with the participation of the stakeholders on need based approaches. It is possible and everyone should work for the development of all with barrier free environment as poverty acts as a barrier for the development.
I am working with the rural poor with the need based empowering strategies.
Looking forward for better networking...
with thanks
Note: This is the comments posted on the above subject at:www.socialedge.org
Saturday, October 16, 2010
HAPPY DESSAR
DEAR ALL
HAPPY DESSAR.
HOPE TO HAVE HAPPY AND COLOURFUL DAYS BRINGING PROSPERITY IN THE LIVES OF THE PEOLE.
with thanks
HAPPY DESSAR.
HOPE TO HAVE HAPPY AND COLOURFUL DAYS BRINGING PROSPERITY IN THE LIVES OF THE PEOLE.
with thanks
Need of amending the National Trust Act tuning to UNCRPD
Dear All
Goodmorning
HAPPY VIJAYA DASAMI
Happy to see and read so much of discussion going on the process of amending our Disability Acts tuning to UNCRPD.
We all should be happy and get best out of this process.
It is the day of Technology and Specialization.
We all need to move forward with positive attitude for getting the right thing to PWDs as RIGHT. There should not be any dispute on this.
All our strengths should be used for empowerment of the PWDs and to create an inclusive / barrier free environment.
After understanding the issues/ process, my comments / suggestions are as follows:
@ The Notional Trust Act is the specialized one on need based and should be retained with amendment tuning to UNCRPD. From specialization, movement / development should move forward but not for generalization (backward).
@ Four types of Disabilities covered under NT i.e., Mental Retardation, Autism, Cerebral Palsy and Multiple Disabilities should be retained with out additions or deletions.
@ NT Act has certainly got better awareness among the stakeholders and reach of its programmes is significant. For example NIRAMAYA & ASMITHA are very good schemes and the later is the answer for the long pending question of a parent that "what will happen to the child after us.
@Thanks to the technology and now every information is available at the click of a mouse. It is up to us to access and create further access / awareness. It is the fact that, we should not wait for others to do for which we are supposed to do.
I have expressed these views on some forums meant for amendments and several participants have accepted to move in the line of specialization rather than coming back to the generalization.
Lets hope for the unity and strong networking for getting the right thing for the right group in an healthy and barrier free environment....
Hope, the feelings are very clear with right based concept and I will be happy to be in touch with all of you for sharing & doing the best in this regard...
Looking forward ...
with thanks
Goodmorning
HAPPY VIJAYA DASAMI
Happy to see and read so much of discussion going on the process of amending our Disability Acts tuning to UNCRPD.
We all should be happy and get best out of this process.
It is the day of Technology and Specialization.
We all need to move forward with positive attitude for getting the right thing to PWDs as RIGHT. There should not be any dispute on this.
All our strengths should be used for empowerment of the PWDs and to create an inclusive / barrier free environment.
After understanding the issues/ process, my comments / suggestions are as follows:
@ The Notional Trust Act is the specialized one on need based and should be retained with amendment tuning to UNCRPD. From specialization, movement / development should move forward but not for generalization (backward).
@ Four types of Disabilities covered under NT i.e., Mental Retardation, Autism, Cerebral Palsy and Multiple Disabilities should be retained with out additions or deletions.
@ NT Act has certainly got better awareness among the stakeholders and reach of its programmes is significant. For example NIRAMAYA & ASMITHA are very good schemes and the later is the answer for the long pending question of a parent that "what will happen to the child after us.
@Thanks to the technology and now every information is available at the click of a mouse. It is up to us to access and create further access / awareness. It is the fact that, we should not wait for others to do for which we are supposed to do.
I have expressed these views on some forums meant for amendments and several participants have accepted to move in the line of specialization rather than coming back to the generalization.
Lets hope for the unity and strong networking for getting the right thing for the right group in an healthy and barrier free environment....
Hope, the feelings are very clear with right based concept and I will be happy to be in touch with all of you for sharing & doing the best in this regard...
Looking forward ...
with thanks
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
